Some thoughts on Joseph Roth’s The Emperor’s Tomb – Die Kapuzinergruft

Published in 1938, Die KapuzinergruftThe Emperor’s Tomb, was one of Joseph Roth’s last novels and the last that was published during his lifetime. Roth died in 1939, in exile, of the complications of a double pneumonia, that was possibly aggravated due to the sudden withdrawal of alcohol.

The Emperor’s Tomb tells the story of Franz Ferdinand Trotta and begins shortly before the first world war and ends with Austria’s Anschluss, the annexation of Austria into Nazi Germany. In many ways the book can be seen as a sequel to The Radetzky March, Joseph Roth’s most famous novel. Usually I would write a brief summary but since this review is part of a readalong and since Emma has already posted an excellent summary of the book, I’ll skip this part and add a link to her post instead – here.

For this post, I’d like to focus on some topics I found of interest.


As many of the readers of this blog know/may remember, for many years, I hosted a Literature and War readalong. Roth had been a chosen author in the past, even though he doesn’t portray the war as such, as rather the mental state of war, or people during war time. I ususally like this approach but in this novel, it was puzzling for several reasons. As I said before, the book begins before WWI, in 1913, and ends in 1938. While Roth describes the time before and after the war years in great detail, things get blurry from 1914 to 1918, although, allegedly, Trotta spends his years in a Russian POW camp in Siberia. If you’d never read anything about any prisoner of war camps, reading this novel would make you think it was a bit of harsher version of a boy scout camp. There aren’t any details described. No fighting happens. This is puzzling, if not bizarre. My knowledge of war literature made me assume one thing – Roth spent his WWI years sheltered. Although I own a huge Roth biography, I haven’t read it yet, but I picked it up and overflew some passages that confirmed what I suspected. He was enlisted but since he was initially considered unfit for military service, he never saw any action, but spent the war years behind a desk. Apparently, to explain why he hadn’t seen any action during the war, he pretended that he had been in Russian captivity, which isn’t true. I think this shows clearly that he must have felt guilty. While I’m not familiar with his earlier years, I know a bit about his final years, and guilt has been a defining emotion for Roth. Once it’s clear that this is why the book is so unspecific when it comes to the actual war, one can move on and concentrate on other elements. As a portrayal of the end of an era and the end of a class system, this is absolutely brilliant and nuanced. And while Trotta’s war experience lacks realism, the way he feels when he comes home doesn’t, because the strong feeling of alienation and of being a stranger in one’s own country was something many Austrians felt at that time.


Before going to war, Trotta marries a girl, Elisabeth, he’d been in love with for ages. Due to a sad story, involving a servant, the marriage isn’t consummated and his new wife flees, angry. When he returns from the war, she’s not exactly keen on seeing him. Like so many women back then, she’s learned to live a life according to her own choices. She certainly doesn’t want to abandon her freedom. And she is living with another woman with whom she clearly is in a physical relationship. Trotta isn’t happy about this but he’s not prejudiced. If it had been a man, it would have been the same to him. Only he might have felt more threatened as the only reason why his wife, in the end returns to him, is because she wants a child. Once the child is born, however, it doesn’t hold her back and she leaves it with his father. I found this surprisingly modern. I’m sure Roth was freethinking when it came to relationships, but I also think that Elisabeth is a character that was quite common at the time. It’s sad to think that so much of that freedom was lost again later.

Austrian pre-war diversity

I don’t think I’ve ever read an author that made me realize just how diverse the Austro-Hungarian Empire was. It was a multinational state, with people speaking different languages, following different religions. In this book Trotta, who is descendant of the non-aristocratic line of the “von Trottas”, feels a stronger connection with the peasant side of his family. While he’s called “Herr Baron”, he doesn’t identify with the aristocracy. When a cousin from Sipolje comes to claim a part of his inheritance, he also introduces Trotta to a friend. That friend invites Trotta to spend time with him in Galicia. Then the war breaks out. Trotta suddenly feel estranged from his former aristocratic friends and asks to be transferred to the regiment in which his cousin and the friend serve. Back in Vienna, after the war, Trotta mourns not only the past but the missed opportunity. He believes that Austria-Hungary could have been a really great state, especially due to its diversity, but instead, it only chose the German part.

Final thoughts

This is a flawed book. The structure is uneven and the war section is so far from realistic, it’s almost painful. Nonetheless, I loved this book. I love Roth’s writing, the mournful tone, his description, his humanity. And there’s also some gentle humour. Roth is outstanding at showing people’s quirks. The portrait of the mother in this book, is an excellent example. At first, she’s very rooted in her old ways, but once change has come, she embraces it and enjoys it because it means there’s new life, where there was only stuffiness before. Sadly, it’s all an illusion, but she’ll never really find out.

I’m glad, Lizzy chose this novel for her readalong. You can find her thoughts here.

This was my fifth Joseph Roth novel and so far, I’ve liked them all. If you’re interested, here are my reviews of Weights and MeasuresHotel Savoy and of Flight Without End.I’ve read The Radetzky March pre-blogging.

22 thoughts on “Some thoughts on Joseph Roth’s The Emperor’s Tomb – Die Kapuzinergruft

  1. Excellent commentary, Caroline. Roth’s biography does explain the unrealistic turn of events during the war years, and that map is just brilliant. I knew the Austro-Hungarian Empire was huge, but not THAT huge!

    • Thanks, Lizzy. Yes, right, such a huge empire. I always forget it. I think Weights and Measures captures that even more. I’m so glad you chose this. I had it for ages but was never really tempted. I’m amazed he was able to write like this in spite of his chaotic life circumstances and the heavy drinking.

  2. A great idea to zoom in on certain specific topics for your post, especially if the plot has been covered elsewhere, I’ve never read Roth, but from what I know of his work (largely from reading various reviews and listening to Volker Weidermann’s Summer Before the Dark on R4’s Book of the Week), I hear what you’re saying about guilt being a defining emotion for him. I get the sense that he was very troubled, particularly towards the end.

    There are times too when the various flaws and imperfections can add to the value or authenticity of a book, and it sounds as if that might be the case here. After all, we are only human, and those individual flaws and failings are part of what makes us human and fallible to an extent.

    • I actually enjoyed writing the post this way. Maybe it’s a bit spoilerish in places but not overly so.
      I read Weidermann’s book ages ago and seem to remember he mentioned the guilt. I think in WWI particularly, men who couldn’t fight felt guilt. More so than during WWII. But maybe I’m wrong.
      You would find a lot to love in Roth’s writing. I’d like to know what you think of him.

      I agree with what you say about the imperfections but the way he wrote about the war was a bit odd. But he has this wonderful quality of being fond of his characters and showing their flaws in way, we can relate.

  3. Roth has been on my radar for years. I will probably start with The Radetzky March. As you describe it, this book sounds like it is full of interesting things. Sometimes, though a work is flawed, it can really be both enlightening and fulfilling.

    Outstanding commentary as always Caroline.

    • Thank you, Brian. I’d recommend to begin with The Radetzky March. Over at Lizzy’s we were discussing organizing a readalong, possibly in spring. I hope you’d feel tempted.

  4. Thanks for the link, Caroline.
    Strangely, the part about WWI didn’t bother me. I thought “That’s it?” but then considered that what Roth wanted to tell wasn’t Trotta’s experience of war.
    He wanted to show the “before” because it was his formative years and we needed that to understand how helpless he feels after the war.
    For me, Roth’s aim was to describe the devastation and feeling if estrangement Trotta felt after his country disappeared.

    I didn’t mention the part about Elisabeth but I totally agree with you. It’s quite modern and it added to Trotta’s feeling that the world was upside down.

    I thought this was a very moving book written by someone who was exiled and felt homesick without any hope to go back to the country he knew and grew up in.

    I also enjoyed that Roth praised the diversity of the Austro-Hungarian empire.

    • I’m sure that’s what interested him the most but there are reasons for that. I think we can find those in his biography. I was less bothered that those years were wrapped up than I was about the way he did it.
      The book may be short but it’s so complex. It’s hard to mention everything in one post. I left out elements you mentioned. I liked the parts about Elisabeth. The whole gender debate feels so contemporary.
      It’s a very moving book. The ending is sad and poignant.

  5. Beautiful review, Caroline! I loved the way you have delved into the beautiful parts and the unrealistic parts of the novel. I loved the fact that the Austria-Hungary of that time was quite modern and Roth depicts it that way. I have read only one of his books, Flight Without End. I loved it. I hope to read The Radetzky March sometime. I will try to read The Emperor’s Tomb after that. I read Volker Weidermann’s Summer Before the Dark a few months back. I loved the way Joseph Roth was depicted in it. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

  6. I’d missed the fact there was a Roth readalong or I may well have joined in – I’ve read all his novels and would have welcomed rereading this. I’m interested to see you notice the flaws but still love his writing which is pretty much how I feel. His later novels are particularly elegiac.

    • I’m sorry you missed this. It would have been so great to have you join. They are elegiac and exuberant. Flawed, yes, but so beautiful. I hope you will join Lizzy and me when we do a readalong if The Radetzky March beginning of next year. I haven’t read everything yet but I’m slowly working my way through his oeuvre.

  7. Pingback: GLM VIII: Author Index – Lizzy's Literary Life

  8. Pingback: what kind of story is joseph roths what i saw - Saw Tool

Thanks for commenting, I love to hear your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.